Latest posts
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last
Search found 31 matches:
Ik wil anale seks!
from riabovalilia on 04/11/2020 02:57 AMRe: Santos Bonacci
from k1w1 on 08/14/2015 02:47 PM"Where the Freeman beliefs led to problems for Santos was the "Right to Travel" aspects."
But even if the reason he didn't pay the tolls had to do with his beliefs about right to travel, the point is what he believes is actually irrelevant... at least to the courts it is, if not to his followers.
Re: A Short History of Robert Menard
from k1w1 on 08/11/2015 01:01 PM"But honestly, the real wonder for me, QuatloosShill, is why people like you do seem to take seriously the patently absurd ideas of jokers like Menard."
Actually, the real question is: Why do you and your Quatloosian cohorts et al perpetrate this "victims" myth; for what purpose do you try to create these Freeman-on-the-land victims where none actually exist?
These Freeman inspired ideas are so patently absurd that people soon enough figure out for themselves it's bunk, no one requires anyone else to warn them away. Meanwhile those people who are attracted to it or who actually put the nonsense to practice, those people aren't there because they honesty believe any of it is or will be accepted by the courts or any other authority (quite the opposite in fact) and they aren't going to be swayed or deterred by anything the anti-Freeman mob says -- in fact, all that probably only serves to stiffen the resolve of those people.
Re: Dean Clifford.
from bmxninja357 on 08/05/2015 10:53 AMso none of you are going to post the truth? did ya look? the guy conned you. he is continuing to con you if your in the fold.
sad fact is its hard to find his "updates" in a working form.when i do, like you know im going to, then i will link the court docs so you can deside if its the truth or a lie. lets see if what deenerino said matches what the court documents reveal. and so you know, not all courts lie. they have no reason. dean does. send him 20 bucks he will tell you why.
the subject of this thread gives me a headache. what a fucking useless goof deaner is.
Re: A Short History of Robert Menard
from k1w1 on 08/01/2015 08:05 PM"...Canadian Common Corps Of Peace Officers, his private peace officer's force commonly known as C3PO. He claimed that anyone could start a peace officer force that had the same legal status as regular police forces. He envisioned Freemen across Canada organizing their own quasi-police forces as a counter-point to the real police forces and using them to enforce their own common laws court laws..."
Dean Clifford.
from bmxninja357 on 07/26/2015 09:58 PManyone who has been following my posts in other places probably knows i have no respect for mr. clifford. this gentleman has been straight up lying to his paying customers and adoring fans. but rest assured he has been presenting fiction in his words and videos. he is a fraud out for one person, himself.
when i was actively persuing the truth about dean i was actually asked to tone it down on one site. i was offended by this so much that it became hard to interact knowing that the truth about dean clifford the person and his teachings were being withheld from the general readers. i do not think any ill will was intended. i just think it was hard for some to comprehend the extent of his lies. but now it is undeniable. we can read the documents. we can put the the videos and updates from his own site, his interviews from around the net, his posts on social media and other places right next to the cold hard court records and see if he was liying and to what degree. well i can tell you its not pretty.
im going to go to some other folks and see if i can get the timeline and facts all in one place. this is so those trying to help those suckered in by dean have a leg to stand on thats easy to find and reference.
more to come.
ninj
Re: A Short History of Robert Menard
from k1w1 on 07/18/2015 12:29 PMHello Quatlooshill, a.k.a. Burnaby49
These people -- who you try to portray as some sort of victims whose actions, or "fires" as you put it, Rob Menard should be responsible for -- these people are not acting with anything that even approaches good faith or honesty and to try and suggest otherwise is just pulling the wool over your eyes or our eyes. When they go off and try these things they're acting no better than Rob Menard is when he also tries doing the same thing, but you only cast one of them, Rob Menard, as a villain and the rest as victims. That's just perverse. They're all as dishonest and as culpable as each other when they wilfully practice their little schemes.
the poll results.
from bmxninja357 on 04/27/2015 07:36 PMLast week's poll was wether alternative media was more reliable than regular media.
Yes was 20% no was 80%
Still open for discussion.
Peace
ninj
Montreal woman convicted of posting anti-police graffiti on Instagram
from bmxninja357 on 04/25/2015 09:25 PMMontreal woman convicted of posting anti-police graffiti on Instagram
MONTREAL -- A woman who posted an image online of a senior Montreal police officer with a bullet in his head was convicted Thursday of criminal harassment.
Jennifer Pawluck was charged in 2013 after snapping a photo of graffiti, which she didn't draw, and uploading it to Instagram, a photo-sharing social media site.
Quebec court Judge Marie-Josee Di Lallo said she had no doubt the criteria necessary to find Pawluck guilty of harassment had been met.
Jennifer Pawluck, charged after posting online a photo of a graffiti showing Montreal police commander Ian Lafreniere with a bullet in his head, leaves a courtroom following her arraignment, in Montreal, Wednesday, April 17, 2013. (Paul Chiasson / THE CANADIAN PRESS)
The judge also made it clear that online behaviour can have repercussions.
"We must be conscious that a simple click from a smartphone or computer, that takes just a fraction of a second, can have serious consequences," Di Lallo said. "At a time when social media is taking more and more place in our lives, we must be even more vigilant."
Cmdr. Ian Lafreniere, one of the city's most visible police officers and the man whose face was on the graffiti, told Pawluck's trial the image shook him up, scared his children and caused his wife to stop working for several months.
Pawluck, now 22, testified in late February she posted the snap without even knowing who Lafreniere was. She conceded the image was not "peaceful" in nature but that she'd sent it as a statement against police in general -- not one officer in particular.
The judge expressed skepticism about Pawluck's claim on the identity issue, given her involvement as an activist during student demonstrations in 2012.
Lafreniere is the main voice of the police force during major events and was very visible on TV during the highly charged student protests, which featured numerous clashes between authorities and demonstrators.
His name was scrawled on the graffiti and his name spelled two different ways was among the hashtags added by Pawluck, including an anti-police tag .acab -- which stands for all cops are bastards.
The judge said she felt the evidence presented was sufficient.
"Seeing your face drawn, with a bullet in the head, one cannot help but feel threatened," Di Lallo said. "And this, even if you're a police officer."
A smirking Pawluck left the courthouse repeating "no comment" as a friend shielded her from cameras. Her lawyer, Valerie De Guise, also declined to speak.
Pawluck was charged under a summary offence, meaning the maximum sentence is six months in jail or a $5,000 fine. Sentencing arguments will take place May 14.
Following her April 2013 arrest, there was intense debate online over whether a criminal charge was necessary in such circumstances. Thursday's guilty verdict reignited that debate.
Prosecutor Josiane Laplante said the question of freedom of expression did not come up during the short trial, which focused strictly on the harassment issue.
Laplante hopes the case will result in increased online prudence.
"I think it's very important to think of the impact we have when we put something on the Internet, the impact on other people when we post something," Laplante said.
Lafreniere told The Canadian Press he wouldn't comment for the time being.
source: http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/montreal-woman-convicted-of-posting-anti-police-graffiti-on-instagram-1.2341840
is it just me or does this appear as a revenge prosecution of something that would normally be considered an utter and complete non event?
peace,
ninj
Re: A Short History of Robert Menard
from QuatloosShill on 04/19/2015 06:42 AMRegardless of whether or not Menard had good intentions he is guilty of major failures. He has tried his concepts personally and, since 2006 (with the Robert Christy litigation), has known those ideas are not accepted by the courts.
He never shared that failure, though, and instead has hidden it.
Menard has since preached the same routine, even though he knows it is false, or at a minimum, it doesn't work.
This is a problem. There is nothing wrong with attempting things and seeing what is or is not correct. The Detaxers were actually very good about that - they shared their litigation efforts, particularly the group around Watson and Lindsay. They freely exchanged transcripts and court documents to try to understand what did and did not work. They maintained a very extensive clearing house for information here;
http://lists.topica.com/lists/Important
where they candidly exchanged ideas and tactics without getting into personal squabbles.
With a few exceptions the Freeman community has been the opposite.
If Menard wants to be useful, then he could start by putting out the fires he has started and which he has ignored. If he is truly a responsible, well-minded individual then he will start acknowledging that what he has taught has been wrong.
You may see Rob sooner than you expect. With the (assumed) collapse of his ACCP scheme there is no longer any need for him to hang around back east and he may head west again. One rumour places him in Winnipeg.